CGS-team Reviews 10

TrustScore 3.5 uit 5

3,3

We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

Bedrijfsgegevens

  1. Softwarebedrijf

Geschreven door het bedrijf

CGS Team is a custom software development company with a modern approach to software development. Our goal is to provide you with the flexibility of an in-house team and act as your technical co-founder.. Our mission is to analyze your idea carefully and protect your budget. As a mark of quality, we offer lifelong support. and marketing assistance for every app we develop.


Contactgegevens

3,3

Gemiddeld

TrustScore 3.5 uit 5

10 reviews

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Geen gegevens bekend over review-uitnodigingen

Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief

Heeft 100% van zijn negatieve reviews beantwoord

Reageert doorgaans binnen 1 maand

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Great team to work with

Great team to work with. They’ve been exceptional from day one, helping bring my vision for a web application to life. Their process is organized, thoughtful, and highly structured, ensuring even the smallest details were captured and executed well. The team is consistently responsive, collaborative, and reliable—truly ideal partners for this project. I would absolutely work with them again.

3 februari 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Very Disappointing Experience - Breach of Contract and Overcharging!

I had an extremely poor experience working with this software development company and strongly advise against hiring them.

The quality of the code delivered was far below professional standards. The codebase was poorly structured, difficult to maintain, and showed clear signs of rushed work rather than thoughtful engineering. This created significant technical debt that we're now having to address.

Communication throughout the project was consistently problematic. The team was unresponsive to questions and feedback, making collaboration frustrating and inefficient. When issues were raised, they were often dismissed or inadequately addressed.

The company breached the terms of our contract in multiple ways. They failed to complete the project within the agreed timeline, leaving us with an incomplete product well past the contracted deadline. Even more concerning, we discovered we were overcharged - specifically, they double-billed us for work that was never actually performed.

When we submitted a pre-trial claim to address these serious issues, the company acknowledged that the project had significant problems but refused to issue a full refund despite their clear breach of contract and billing misconduct.

Most concerning was the sense that the company was primarily focused on collecting payment rather than delivering quality work or honoring their contractual obligations. The final product fell well short of what was promised and what we paid for.

I would strongly advise others to look elsewhere for software development services and to be extremely cautious if considering this company.

Reply:

Thank you for your reply. I will clarify several factual points for accuracy.

Regarding the chargeback:
We did initiate a chargeback, which was declined by the payment provider at that stage. However, the bank explicitly confirmed in writing that, should a formal investigation occur, they would be willing to cooperate fully with us and with law enforcement. Presenting this as a finding in your favor is therefore misleading.

Regarding “working product” claims:
Demonstrating a system running on your own server does not establish contractual compliance. The delivered product was not fully functional and did not operate as described in the contract or SOW, nor did it meet the agreed technical and functional specifications. The core issue was not hosting or deployment, but non-conformance with documented requirements.

Independent technical audit:
Following delivery, the codebase was reviewed by an independent third-party technical auditor. The findings confirmed serious deficiencies in structure, maintainability, and implementation quality. The auditor raised clear concerns regarding the standard of the work and the level of technical debt present.

Regarding complaints and communication:
Contrary to your statement, concerns were raised repeatedly and consistently throughout the project. We submitted numerous written complaints, defect reports, and requests for correction. These were frequently met with responses such as “we will fix it” without resolution, or with no response at all. Many of these issues remained unresolved at the end of the engagement.

Regarding acceptance of work and payments:
Payments made under a post-completion or milestone-based model do not waive the right to later identify deficiencies, architectural flaws, or billing inconsistencies once the full system is reviewed as a whole. Several critical issues only became fully apparent after comprehensive internal review and independent audit.

Regarding defamation claims:
This review reflects our experience and professional assessment of the outcome. It contains statements of opinion and fact supported by documentation, audit findings, and correspondence. Disagreement with our conclusions does not render them defamatory.

The purpose of this review is to accurately inform others of our experience and to encourage due diligence. We reserve all rights to pursue appropriate remedies based on the facts and documentation available.

24 juni 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Logo CGS-team

Antwoord van CGS-team

Dear Besmir,
We have reviewed your feedback and, in the interest of balance, wish to clarify the situation and provide details to contest your defamatory statements.
Following the completion of our collaboration, you requested a full refund, even though you had received all deliverables and the planned tasks were fully completed.
Background. First, we note that the collaboration between your company Paydiex EOOD (Sedava.IO) and ours took place from September 7, 2023, to July 5, 2024. Each development phase was governed by a separate Service Agreement and SOW, each outlining the tasks and corresponding fees. Prior to signing, you were informed of the overall development budget as well as the payment schedule for each phase: the first phase consisted of 13 payments, and the second phase – 3 payments.
Throughout the collaboration, payments were made by you under post-completion model, and the agreements granted you the right to dispute the work or invoices or terminate the collaboration at your discretion. However, no complaints were raised during the project, and all agreements were fully performed.
Pre-litigation dispute resolution. We would like to remind you that you previously attempted to initiate chargebacks through the payment system without basis, aiming to block our operations during the dispute review. Your request was rejected because we had sufficient evidence regarding the nature of the transactions.
Subsequently, you submitted a pre-litigation claim requesting a refund with an unjustified amount of compensation. We rejected all claims, providing the following clarifications:
Invoices were sent to your email, and you personally confirmed each payment. This shows that over 1 year, you consistently made payments, accepted the work, and participated in the process, yet only after completion did you request a full refund.
No official objections or complaints were raised during the collaboration.
All source code and other deliverables were fully transferred to you.
Regarding your claim that the product was not deployed because you discontinued hosting payments, we demonstrated its functionality on our server, which proves that the obligations were fulfilled.
Your assertion that we acknowledged or accepted your claim is false. We provided full evidence supporting our position under applicable law and the jurisdiction agreed upon in the contracts.
Communication. Post-project communication continued throughout the contractual warranty period and beyond.
Your pre-litigation efforts failed due to a lack of legal grounds. However, your review contains statements amounting to defamation, compelling us to clarify the details of this case, which characterize your company Paydiex EOOD (Sedava.IO) and you as CTO of Sedava.IO as an unreliable counterparty that, after 1 year of collaboration, may request a refund without a proper legal basis and act contrary to the doctrine of venire contra factum proprium.
Despite this, we value our cooperation and wish you success.

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Would Not Recommend Based on Our Experience

We hired CGS for a development project that was contractually meant to be completed within six months. The project ended up being delayed for nearly two years, with repeated missed deadlines and poor communication throughout.

After several failed attempts to resolve the matter directly, we submitted a formal pre-trial claim. The company responded, acknowledged issues with the project’s delivery, but then stopped communicating and took no further action. As a result, we are now preparing to take legal action to protect our interests.

This has been a highly disappointing experience, both professionally and financially. We hope this review helps others make informed decisions and encourages CGS to improve their accountability and follow-through.

Responding to CGS: this review is accurate and not accidental. An independent third-party audit concluded that the work delivered was of the worst quality and failed to meet accepted IT standards, and our company was charged for items that were not completed. We will share the audit and further information with Trustpilot to substantiate our experience.

Second response: Our review remains unchanged.

24 juni 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Logo CGS-team

Antwoord van CGS-team

Thank you for your feedback.

Are you sure you did not confuse us with this company?
https://rocketreach.co/cgs-israel-computer-generated-solutions-profile_b7c72999c1888896

We have reviewed our client records and found no project or contract matching your description. Our company does not provide services in Israel, and we have no record of cooperation with you.

If this review was posted in error or under a different name, please contact us directly at contact@cgsteam.io so we can clarify the situation. We take authenticity and transparency seriously and will also notify Trustpilot to verify the legitimacy of this review.

UPD: 30.11
Dear Jeniston Nekberg,

We conducted a thorough internal check and asked all team members about your name, email, and any related project. We could not find any record of working with you or any project matching your description.

Our company operates strictly under client agreements that include a guaranteed 12-month support period for all software we deliver.

To clarify this situation, please contact us directly at contact@cgsteam.io
and provide any proof of cooperation (contract, payment confirmation, project details).

At the moment, the information you provided does not match any of our clients or projects, which raises concerns about the authenticity of this review. We are ready to investigate further once we receive verifiable details from you.

So again are you sure you did not confuse us with this company?
https://rocketreach.co/cgs-israel-computer-generated-solutions-profile_b7c72999c1888896

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

CGS Team develops great software that…

CGS Team develops great software that met our needs.
CGS Team was hired by our company to develop our software both backend and front-end and we couldn't be more happy with the result. The company provides as part of their competitive package a business analyst and a product manager which get to know your business inside out and provide the right kind of services when building the software, anticipating the needs of their clients.

23 oktober 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Creative and skilled teams

We have struck up a great partnership with the CGS team across different projects, hard technical problems to solve, and the use of different technologies to create mobile and web apps to work with fine-tuning the latest AI models.

It has been a pleasure collaborating with the hard-working teams across the organisation. It's been exciting to see our projects grow from nascent ideas to fully-fledged products.

10 juni 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

The best tech partner

Working with the CGS team has been an outstanding experience. They are like family now. Communication, professionalism, creativity and solution oriented. They are the perfect tech partner for anyone trying to build their tech solution.

29 mei 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Great development/project experience

CGS-Team helped me develop a significant portion of my iOS app for adults with ADHD with a Python backend and assisted with the App Store launch. The communication from the lead developer, Timur, and the PM, Khrystyna, was exceptional. They genuinely cared about my app and focused on developing it right the first time. They were incredibly nice, hands-on, and quick to respond on Slack. They efficiently handled small design changes and kept the development on track. Overall, a great experience! Highly recommend their services.

27 januari 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

An excellent job refactoring my iOS app Coconut Baby

I recently had the pleasure of working with CGS-Team on a significant refactoring project for my iOS app, CoconutBaby. I left thoroughly impressed! There were a number of complex problems through the project and they address these with innovative solutions and both operated very independently but brought me in as needed. I'd definitely use them again and highly recommend them!

1 april 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Working with CGS team has been a very…

Working with CGS team has been a very positive experience throughout. Margo was a brilliant BA who really understand the brief, and Oleksii has been great to work with too. Very understanding and reasonable. He is leading a strong team of developers, designers and project managers.

If you need something built, then CGS-team will make it happen for you.

1 februari 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

We had a great experience

We had a great experience with Oleksi and and Danyyl. We have a team of full time developers at Grapevine Technologies Inc (go-grapevine.com), and the CGS team was able to merge into our processes, workflows and code very smoothly. After helping build the base of our system efficiently and quickly, Danyyl became one of our strongest developers, outputting projects at incredible rates. Clear, professional, efficient and this was all delivered at a very reasonable price. We were fortunate to work together for almost 1 year and were very satisfied. Furthermore the management structure and team surrounding the CGS developers was strongly and clearly communicative.

7 juli 2022
Review zonder uitnodiging

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.

Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer