We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

3,2

Gemiddeld

TrustScore 3 uit 5

1 review

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Geen gegevens bekend over review-uitnodigingen

Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

3,2

Alle reviews

(1)

1 review in de afgelopen 12 maanden

Een review schrijven

Wij controleren reviews

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Beware of this so-called specialist litigation firm

A so-called specialist litigation firm that, in my experience, specialised in one thing: billing.

I instructed Hägen Wolf and Mr Philip Copley in August 2025 after my previous solicitor had left my case in ruins — a poorly prepared evidence bundle submitted late, a missed court fee, and the claim nearly struck out twice. My instruction was simple: repair the damage and get the case into a fighting position before trial. I paid close to £20,000 for that.

It did not happen.

The case went to trial in virtually the same state as when they took it over. The same flawed evidence bundle that drove me to switch firms in the first place went before the judge untouched. The judge described it as a mess. After nearly £20,000, nothing had been fixed.

What I got instead of legal work was a billing ledger dominated by emails. Reading them, sending them, forwarding them. Liaising with the previous solicitor, the defendant, the court. That is paralegal work. In most firms it would be handled by a secretary. I was charged specialist solicitor rates for it. And the substance of those emails? Largely passing on what the barrister had said. The analysis, the strategy, the actual legal thinking — that all came from counsel. Mr Copley's contribution, as far as I could see, was to act as a relay and issue invoices.

I never received a single piece of work in which the solicitor himself sat down with my facts, examined my arguments, and told me what he actually thought. That is not a specialist litigator. That is a postbox with a letterhead.

The amended Particulars of Claim, £1,500 billed, drafted by counsel, were never deployed because by the time they were finalised, it was too late to use them. I paid for work that never made it into the courtroom.

Everyone knows litigation carries risks. I did not need to spend nearly £20,000 to be told that repeatedly. I hired a specialist to tell me why my case was worth pursuing, how to strengthen it, and what needed to change. That guidance never came.

I lost. I am not going to pretend that plays no part in this review, it does. But losing is not the whole story. On top of nearly £20,000 in fees, the judge ordered me to pay the other side £13,500. More than £33,000 gone, and the case arrived at trial in no better condition than the day they took it on.

I filed a formal complaint. Every point was rejected without exception. No fault, no accountability, no reflection. The response blamed my previous solicitor, quoted my own words back at me, and treated generic risk warnings as though they constituted legal advice. They do not. The letter closed with a demand for immediate payment and a threat of enforcement action, despite the fact I had paid every invoice promptly throughout, often within 24 hours, and on occasion before a formal invoice had even been raised.

This is my experience. If you are considering instructing this firm, please think very carefully before you do. I would give zero stars if the option existed.

Update 28 April 2026:

After my complaint was rejected, the issues did not stop there.

The firm chased me for an invoice I had already paid in full, the day after their own complaint response letter demanded it. That same letter had failed to include a separate outstanding balance on an earlier invoice, meaning their own demand was incomplete to begin with. When I pointed this out, instead of acknowledging the error or offering any apology, they sent me my own emails back and attempted to blame me for not keeping track of their books. A client should not be expected to reconcile their solicitor's own accounts. To make matters worse, they had been chasing me for the wrong invoice number entirely, the outstanding balance belonged to a different invoice altogether.

One final warning: be very careful with what you put in writing if you instruct this firm. They are skilled at quoting your own emails back at you to deflect responsibility, as though that alone absolves them of their failings. For a firm that specialises in billing their clients, this is simply embarrassing.

26 maart 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging

Is dit jouw bedrijf?

Claim je profiel om toegang te krijgen tot de gratis zakelijke tools van Trustpilot en versterk de relatie met je klanten.

Gratis account aanmaken

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer