Painting your customers as theives
I will not tolerate lies or attempts to paint me as someone who has “harassed” your team when, in fact, it was you who called me shouting abuse because you couldn’t provide a service you originally promised.
To ensure transparency, here is a verified timeline of events — all supported by WhatsApp messages and screenshots:
15th July:
Order placed. I spoke with Romilda, who confirmed an ETA of 3–4 business days for both the Oral B and Clinique products.
25th July:
I requested an update. Romilda responded that the order should arrive “by next week at the latest.”
31st July:
After being ignored, I followed up again. On 1st August, Romilda replied:
“Yes unfortunately latest it should arrive by next week — if not we can issue a 50% refund if the delay does extend by next week.”
To be clear: I never requested a 50% refund the company offered it themselves. This can be verified by the messages.
8th August:
I followed up again and was told the order was “stuck in transit” and that compensation would be provided once delivered. I asked whether to cancel for a full refund or proceed with the 50% refund they had suggested. I was ignored.
9th August:
When I chased again, I was told to refer to their cancellation policy (allowing them to keep 20%). Romilda also said, “I cannot guarantee a date, but it should arrive next week.”
When I mentioned the 50% refund offer, she initially dismissed it but then said it would be “processed in 3 days.” When I asked her to confirm the refund amount, I was ignored again — instead, she said the Clinique items would arrive by the end of the week.
The story changed from “refund in 3 days” to “items arriving soon,” with no accountability. Later, she said only the Oral B items would be refunded, not the Clinique, despite her earlier written confirmation that both would be.
My issue has never been the delays, it’s the inconsistency and dishonesty.
Phone Call:
Tyrell later called me using Romilda’s phone. He shouted abuse as I tried to explain the situation, boasting about his “£100k VAT-registered company.” After a heated back-and-forth, he admitted there was “miscommunication.”
At no point did either of them mention that the 50% refund (which they offered) would later be called a deposit. That claim only appeared weeks later, seemingly made up to justify their own confusion.
The compensation for the Clinique items took over a week to arrive via bank transfer, and only after I chased them multiple times, not because the company followed up responsibly.
29th August:
I asked for an update on the Oral B items.
2nd September:
Romilda offered me an alternative, either replace the items or issue a refund. I chose the refund. She confirmed that if the items were not delivered within 7 working days, I would receive a refund plus compensation.
9th September:
Exactly seven days later, Romilda asked if I had “paid for the Oral Bs.” I forwarded the original invoice confirming full payment. Then the story changed again:
“A 50% deposit was given back to you until delivery.”
Suddenly, what was previously written as a “refund” became a “deposit.” She claimed the items had been delivered and demanded repayment, even though I hadn’t received anything. When I pointed this out, she replied:
“I’m so sorry, I was told you received the items.”
This proves the company has no control or record of its own operations.
Also, despite promising “refund + compensation” if the 7-day deadline passed, I never received any compensation.
To the public:
I never demanded a refund, it was offered to me.
My messages were limited to following up on updates and clarifying inconsistencies. That is not harassment.
The company also asked me to take down my review by offering incentives and other products. I declined. After I updated my review again, they messaged me a week later offering me £200 to remove it. I declined once more — and they blocked me immediately after.
Following this, Tyrell sent threatening messages, including:
“Anyway we made 100k a month for 3 months in a row now.”
“If you don’t remove the review.”
“Good luck.”
That is not professionalism — it’s intimidation.
You claim to have “offered a fair resolution.” Please explain what was fair about:
• Accusing a customer of theft,
• Changing your story from refund to deposit,
• Failing to deliver goods after repeated delays,
• Ignoring messages,
• Threatening legal action, and
• Attempting to bribe me to remove my review.
why are there two Trustpilot accounts madourieco.net and madourieco.co.uk?
Stop lying on my name.
Stop twisting your own words.
Stop claiming to be a “professional” company while repeatedly contradicting yourselves and attempting to silence honest feedback.
Every statement here is supported by messages, screenshots, and time-stamped proof that I am fully prepared to provide.
20 oktober 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging