Serious Concerns Regarding Publisher Accounts, Payments, Pricing and Verification
Hello,
I have also been checking the recent feedback from other publishers, and unfortunately, it appears that many publishers are currently disappointed with the platform.
Previously, everything was working smoothly for both publishers and the platform, but recently many issues seem to have developed. Some publishers have had their accounts deactivated without a clear explanation, while others are still waiting for payments for orders they have already completed.
Another major concern is the reduction of publisher prices. In some cases, websites were listed at a certain agreed price, and the price was later reduced without any proper explanation. There are even cases where articles were already published based on the previously agreed price, but the payment is now being calculated at a much lower rate. I am facing a similar issue myself.
I kindly request that management conduct a detailed review of the publisher system and address these issues properly. Clearing pending payments and reactivating legitimate publisher accounts would be a very important step toward rebuilding trust with publishers.
### Ownership Verification
I would also like to raise a concern regarding the new ownership verification requirement.
If a website was already added to the platform and has been working with you for a long time, I don't believe existing publishers should be required to go through the ownership verification process again. If ownership verification is necessary for new publishers joining the platform, that is understandable, but I would strongly recommend considering an exemption for existing, established publishers.
### Pricing Formula
Another major concern is the current pricing formula based on DA.
As I understand it, the platform is limiting the maximum publisher price based on a formula involving DA × 2.5, while also deducting a fixed margin of around $35 from the publisher's price.
I don't believe DA alone is an accurate way to determine the value of a website. Many high-quality websites charge hundreds or even thousands of dollars for sponsored content, but under the current formula, some of these sites may only be allowed to list at a very low price on the platform.
This makes it difficult for publishers to continue offering high-quality websites through your platform. If publishers cannot receive a reasonable price for their placements, many of them will simply stop adding their websites to the dashboard.
I strongly recommend reviewing or removing this formula and considering other factors when determining publisher pricing, such as website quality, traffic, niche, location of the audience, authority, editorial standards, and the actual market price of the publication.
Ultimately, I believe these changes would benefit both sides. Publishers would have a reason to continue working with the platform, while the platform would have access to more high-quality websites and a stronger publisher network.
I sincerely request that management review all of these issues, including:
* Pending publisher payments
* Deactivated publisher accounts
* Previously agreed prices being reduced
* Ownership verification requirements for existing publishers
* The current DA-based pricing formula
* Activation of legitimate existing publisher websites
The platform worked very well in the past, and I believe these issues can be resolved if they are properly reviewed at the management level.
I hope you will take this feedback seriously and work toward a solution that is fair and beneficial for both publishers and the platform.
Thank you for your time and consideration.








