Saunders Law Reviews 

8
TrustScore 2 uit 5

2,2

We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

Bedrijfsgegevens

  1. Advocatenkantoor
  2. Advocaat
  3. Juridische dienstverlening

Informatie afkomstig van verschillende externe bronnen

Saunders Law is a specialist litigation & dispute resolution law firm based in the heart of London's legal district. Contact us today for expert help & advice.


Contactgegevens

2,2

Slecht

TrustScore 2 uit 5

8 reviews

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Geen recente geschiedenis van het vragen naar reviews

Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet recentelijk uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief

Heeft nog niet op negatieve reviews gereageerd

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

2,2

Alle reviews

(8)

3 reviews in de afgelopen 12 maanden

Een review schrijven

Wij controleren reviews

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

DO NOT USE SAUNDERS LAW !!!!!!

Ignorant and arrogant are under statements when describing this law firm.
Calls and emails never returned !
The only interest they have is conning money from there clients to achieve nothing in return.
If your case/claim is important to you then don’t take the risk of letting these useless, arrogant clowns anywhere near it, search out a professional and reputable law firm that actually takes professional pride in there work and client care.

30 april 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

What a disgusting witch

What a disgusting witch who just answered the phone to me! First time
I called this firm just now and the lady reacted as though I called her house phone! Didn’t feel as though I called a law firm. Yuck. She said she can’t help me and slammed the phone down.

30 april 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Money Grabbing and useless

My son was arrested with 3 other people, Saunders decided to take on all 4 as clients whilst on Duty. My son had two different people sit in on interviews with him, and a completely different person represent him in court. I was in court when my son was given bail, we drove the two hour journey home, and at about 7pm I received a call from Lucy Watson to say, your son was give bail today, Joke.
I was never given a telephone number, nor a follow up call, no information at all, the only time My son heard from them was a letter he received, AFTER we had tried to engage another solicitor, as Saunders were now worrying about losing money. Several attempts to get y son;s legal aid transferred to another solicitor have been contested by Saunders, despite them still representing another defendant and it being a conflict of interest. They are not interested in engaging with any of their clients and will turn up on the day with about as much knowledge on the case as they do now. Only interested in not losing the legal aid money- They are criminal

30 juni 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Dangerous Ethical Breaches and stolen money

@Saunders_Law
My review is lead with direct experience with the firm.
Alistair parker stole from me and continues to dispute costs when owing up to the appropriate refund would be the most satisfying response. You were the one that phoned me not the other way around ten seconds before I fired you.
Karan sent paper documents against my consent to my address as I have never dealt with legal matters in paper format. Karan sent the papers against my consent, with intent to ignore clients wishes of how they want their personal information handled she did this to cause me deliberate distress and to hope my documents were opened by others than myself. I returned the papers once, she sent them again weeks apart, I returned them again. Requesting repeatedly to stop handling my legally privileged information in this way as it's breaching the gdpr legislation and putting my personal affairs at risk if lost or stolen. Before sending my documents the first offence, Karan is emailed 5 times not to do so. Therefore, if this was not on purpose, I would aver Karan is computer illiterate and cannot read or write, I wonder if that will be apart of her defence. Wrote 'to the occupier of the house' without confirmation of my address. The documents had been returned, she sent them again. Such behaviour will be answerable to a number of regulatory bodies in the uk. Receptionists of firms are employees of the firm and when fines are awarded for negligence it is not to individuals it is to firms. Ie James Saunders. I emailed the owner and no response from Mr Saunders. I have made the commissioners office aware of the dangers of her actions towards protecting client information, which is also of interest to other regulatory bodies. Karan a substandard receptionist is committed to coming out of her role as a desk worker and her comments are usually if not always, condescending, inappropriate and her attitude and behaviour is not professional. She will put your information at risk if she does not like you and Karan made it very clear after sacking Alistair she did not like me, which her wholly displaced attitude sees no ends in sight. She does not belong at this firm. Karan did this knowing the contents of information was of a medical/legal nature which carries heavy fines from the Commissioners Office, this should also put all who respects and seeks to uphold the protection of their personal information to avoid this firm. The firm cannot identify vulnerable clients and my lawyer Ali Parker picked a barrister that was not equipped for the case even though as of this date he remains paid and did not act for me. He said he knew the judge how weird is that. Avoid and protect yourselves, they will not win your case for you which is why I had to sack Alistair on the spot. Karan will seek to ignore clients requests of how they want their data used and shared and in what formats. Karan will do so with intent to risk your information of legally privileged content. Karan has become a liability to her place of employment. Do not use this firm, there had been comments also made at the reception desk to me in 'jest' regarding the percentage lawyers get before the partners which was in turn, slagging the owner off, they don't even like their own firm. I also asked for a meeting face to face with my lawyer or the owner of the firm to which they wouldn't face me and all respectable firms would absolutely invite a client into a private meeting room. Which shows, respectable is not apart of their ethical values at the firm. For all clients seeking a law with respect and integrity you must not use this firm and you must ensure you find a law firm that with every employee represents you and your needs and what you stand for and the correct representation you want. If this is how she treats high paying clients I wonder what troubled internal issues are with them as a company, their reviews on glassdoor are equally as bad from employees.

27 augustus 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Another bogus firm who advertise action…

Another bogus firm who advertise action against the police but want customers to leave name and telephone number before they even advise you if they will accept the case or not.

Most firms who want a clients details when they do not want to take the case on, . why do you want people’s details if your firm is not taking on cases. This is a sinister agenda behind this only these firms know.

Avoid at all costs another useless firm false advertising action against the police.

1 april 2023
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

What a bad experience!

What a bad experience! Without knowing all the facts, Matthew believes that our company is impersonating their law firm to forge letters, yet we are just victims. This man and his law firm are illogical and not professional! After I gave all the evidence, I just asked for his apology and didn't reply, arrogant and rude! How can such a lawyer protect his defender? Don't be fooled! This lawyer and law firm is terrible!

11 augustus 2022
Review zonder uitnodiging

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.

Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer