PPI2Pass.com Reviews 584

I like the practices and flashcards. The readings and video times that they say will take is a little misleading. I take notes with the readings and videos so when I am planning things I now have to make a new schedule. For example the Business operations reading says it 1hr 18min but in reality with notes it’s like 5 hours. Maybe it’s just me but I’d like it be more personal to me. Smaller readings over time so that it is more digestible.

After failing the FS the first time I took it, I decided to purchase both the surveying solved problems and the FS practice exam. I passed my second try with the help of these study materials.

I took few on demand FE civil courses and most of the instructors just read through slides. Then I took live PE transportation course & about similar experience. Due to certain circumstances I had to transfer my session to future session & guess what I hit the jackpot coz the instructor was amazing. He actually explained the content; and made things so easy to understand that you will not forget. If anyone taking PE transportation I would recommend to take Mahmoud Alzioud sessions. He is the most amazing instructor who will explain the content in the easiest way & you will grasp the concept in no time. He would tell you the points where engineers are tend to make mistakes in exams so you will look for specific details in problems & know the trick to solve. I wish I could give this instructor 10 star review.

I like the layout of the material and the concept of the study scheduling. I have to say I feel like the timing goals it sets for reviewing provided material is inaccurate. The amount of material and depth of example problems I feel go into too much depth as you're getting through the material for the first time. A lot of the concepts I am re-learning as I have not seen them since university.

We have been having issues with getting our professors lecture videos for this class to be uploaded. I prefer the way our professor goes over the material, however I don't get the option to see his videos. Also this was supposed to be a live online class, and it's more on demand than it is live. I have 1 set of office hours that I can catch all of my questions from another person's lecture to then ask this professor.

so far I feel that the website at first it somewhat confusing to find the info one looks for. For example, one should be able to separate their studies with "breath" section and "depth" section, but I guess that's irrelevant now that the exam format will change.
However,
The biggest issue I see is that the slide proved to download do not entire match the vide lecture.
Also, "Analysis and Design: Video Part 2" (for the civil WRE depth section) the last example problem it shows has the wrong numbers, answer and completely does not match the lecture slides either. it is ridicules that I am paying for a review course that supposed to help study but instead hinders it by confusing me and making me spend time to find the courses mistakes.

I am using the Questions Bank now and it is so easy to tailor your quiz based on the subject, Incorrect Questions, unused, Number of questions, etc.

I’ve noticed two errors in the quizzes so far and I’m only in my first week of studying. The website claimed that the material had been updated for the new April 2024 PE, however the lectures have not been updated. I also confirmed this with an agent before I purchased the course. For how expensive this course is, there really shouldn’t be any errors and there’s no easy way to report errors.

First: They have no clue of what is coming in the PE exam. I searched left and right on the questions I was unable to answer on the test and couldnt find anything on the CERM, study guide and other reference material. Their problems are way too hard compare to what is coming in the test which takes away from learning other valuable information or strategies. Their lessons are gear towards calcs and little to none theory.

Second: My instructor was changed last minute and the schedule hours were very late at night than what we were signed for. They fixed that by letting us know the classes will still be available on demand. We all pay for live sessions. No refund was offered to the people that could not make it to live sessions.

I follow their instructions to the T. I made it to each class, pass all my homework quizzes, actively participate in class, filled up two 3in binders with materials, examples, notes and homework problem, once the classes were over I spent a month of solving problems, took my test in a month from the last live session and was shocked and how unhelpful PPI classes and material were.

It is not worth the $3000 price tag!

Very rude service. Trying to get clarification on what needs to happen based on the book PPI pass guarantee. No help received

Step by step solution and explanation detail content.

The classes are not uploaded in time. For the people that can’t attend the classes this is setting up for failure.

The study subjects were accurate and covered the subjects I saw on the FE exam, however the practice was noticeably harder than the exam questions.

I received the books yesterday. They came in perfect shape. I have not started to study so I cannot review the contents of the books.

The Teacher is poor and strong accent and so confused.

The service is great. However, I have been trying to access on my phone to study when I am unable to be around a computer. However, I am unable to login. It says the passwords do not match however I have checked and I am sure I am putting in the same one. When attempting to talk to the chat it was no help because it says it is unable to find my account even though I am logged in. If someone is able to reach out that would be great.

The lectures are well prepared

I was miss informed and bought the material for CA PE seismic. They were out dated and I have to return it!

While the current curriculum is satisfactory, there is a need for a seamless transition to the new test format. The existing curriculum appears remarkably similar to the version used before the shift to computer-based testing. Approximately 90% of the test samples exhibit a striking resemblance to those from previous years. This lack of diversity raises concerns about the effectiveness of the updated format in truly assessing a broader range of skills and knowledge. Therefore, it is imperative to reassess and revamp the curriculum to ensure that it aligns cohesively with the new computer-based format, providing a more comprehensive and relevant evaluation tool for the students.