We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

Lees wat reviewers zeggen

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Penny was a fantastic help. With the ai reader getting confused by my pay which came in bi-weekly rather than monthly she took the time to manually review my case after assuring me I would in fact be... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Penny was amazing and so understanding and helpful when I told her I accidentally got rid of the direct debit I had setup because I tried to get rid of my gym membership one. She was very understandin... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

I contacted Tabeo regarding a refund and Penny was very helpful. She explained the situation clearly and answered my questions promptly. Thank you, Penny, for your help!

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

absolutely shocking customer service. Under FCA rules, tabeo is obliged to provide a human to human contact telephone number which has been cut off. It is nearly impossible to resolve some account pr... Toon meer

Bedrijfsgegevens

  1. Financieringsmakelaar
  2. Softwarebedrijf

Geschreven door het bedrijf

Make specialist care more affordable and accessible online


Contactgegevens

4,5

Uitstekend

TrustScore 4.5 uit 5

2K reviews

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Geen recente geschiedenis van het vragen naar reviews

Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet recentelijk uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief

Heeft nog niet op negatieve reviews gereageerd

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

4,5

Alle reviews

(2.049)

227 reviews in de afgelopen 12 maanden

Een review schrijven
Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

I highly recommend Dominque

I highly recommend Dominque who provided an excellent service. He guided me through the process of setting up the account to completion. Just wish there were more Dominique’s in the world of Service Provision.

19 november 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Don't enter FTE if you are a Director

It's common for the Managing Director of a company to also be a full-time employee of that same company. When completing lending applications, my experience has been that it is preferable for the lender to know you are FTE, and that your job title is MD.

I would suspect the most important thing is establishing your income so that, as a responsible lender, an informed decision can be made. To facilitate this, one is typically given the option to specify various income sources.

Unfortunately, in choosing full-time employment, I was only asked for salary; no option was given for additional income sources before the application was processed.

When I contacted the online support to explain the situation, it was suggested that I had to contact the third party in order to rectify the situation.

I explained that I did not think it was appropriate for me to have to redo the entire application, and in particular for me to have to involve the third party, when neither of us were “at fault" so to speak. I took the time to suggest two possible ways in which the application process might be improved in order to mitigate this issue in future.

I also provided them with a full summary of my annual income detailing the sources of income along with a true and correct total income. I also provided a copy of my SA100 to evidence this. I asked if the application could be reviewed in light of them now having the necessary, accurate information.

This was refused and the original advice reiterated. In the absence of any explanation as to why a review of the existing application could not be undertaken, I was left with the impression that this company did not particularly care about the issue. Nor did they respect the fact that this would now place an additional burden on me, the consumer, as well as their client for whom they are acting as an intermediary for as a finance broker.

This is disappointing, because I suspect many people will rely on such a facility in order to be able to manage the costs of healthcare. As such, I think it is important that a company acting as gatekeeper to people’s health and wellbeing recognises the need to be sensitive, due to the potential impact of creating additional friction in the process of people trying to balance their health with any financial concerns they might have.

For my part, I am in the fortunate position that I have the choice to refuse to use this service now, and pay the clinician directly. I will also explain to the clinician exactly why I am doing this, as they might otherwise be unaware of how their patients are being treated.

I acknowledge this is a small inconvenience. It is not the inconvenience itself that is the issue. It is the failure to share ownership of the issue, and the potential for that to cause second-order issues, particularly if people are in vulnerable situations.

I accept my failure to select the correct option. I understand that it was because of this I was then unable to provide the information that I needed to. On realising my error, I made the effort to correct my mistake by taking the time to find the correct information, collate this into a useful format, and provide it to the lender so that they might be able to re-process with a minimum of hassle.

I think that this organisation has an opportunity now to reflect on what (if any) mistakes they might have made and how they might have handled the situation better.

18 november 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Excellent service

Eugenia provided a Excellent service. With Great communication and was very quick and informative regarding everything

18 november 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer