A publication that has no moral principles. It practises the dark art of trapping subscribers into involuntary auto renewal. Whole web site has no access to any feature that allows for disabling of au... Toon meer
We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie
Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie
Lees wat reviewers zeggen
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the... Toon meer
Bedrijf heeft geantwoord
Took out time limited offer and cancelled in good time. They ignored cancellation and took further £65 from card. They reluctantly agreed to refund within ten working days. At end of period said probl... Toon meer
Bedrijf heeft geantwoord
You start a trial with the intention of giving the product a go. You set up a reminder on your calendar to either cancel or continue with subscription. They process the renewal charge more than one... Toon meer
Bedrijf heeft geantwoord
Bedrijfsgegevens
Geschreven door het bedrijf
Science news and science articles from New Scientist
Contactgegevens
2 Derry Street, W8 5TT, London, Verenigd Koninkrijk
- www.newscientist.com
Geen recente geschiedenis van het vragen naar reviews
Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet recentelijk uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief
Heeft 96% van zijn negatieve reviews beantwoord
Reageert doorgaans binnen 48 uur
Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot
Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.
I gave them my email address and now…
I gave them my email address and now the emails from them are endless and don't seem to stop after telling them to fork off.
For example it's 12:20pm and I have allready recieved 3 emails from them today.
Can you actually be this bad by mistake?
**Update 2**
Now the digital subscription has disappeared from my subscription, leaving me only with print. Or actually without print as the magazines are no longer arriving.
**Update**
Subscription email address still not updated.
Neither replacement nor subsequent issue have arrived.
The magazine is really very good, it's light enough to read easily but still informative. Of course, nothing is covered in any depth but there's certainly enough to whet an appetite.
And that's where the good bit ends, the subscription service is flawed. My subscription was started at the wrong date, and then on the correct starting date - well the magazine just didn't arrive and I have no faith in the replacement or subsequent issues turning up.
Customer Service was surly and uncooperative, implying that I had failed as a customer because I hadn't reported their errors earlier.
If you want to change your email address, you may as well put a note in a bottle and sling it in the sea.
On the whole, what a shame. Its not a cheap rag, but they treat it as such. Please don't cheapen yourselves NS by replying with the customer care email address, everyone complaining have clearly been in touch previously and the reviews are the result.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Never again
Tried for the second time to order this magazine; issues never turned up, customer service claimed Canada Post was losing them (seriously?), and have not cancelled my sub despite multiple requests to do so. And what kind of online subscription service doesn't let you cancel online? I am never, ever, dealing with NS again.

Antwoord van New Scientist
poor problem resolution
Have been a subscriber for years. Quite disappointed with the lack of response to problems regarding downloading magazines after Re-subscribing, even though my subscription remains current. I can’t recommend the service and will consider unsubscribing.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Trying to prevent auto-renewal
I have been a subscriber since March, having bought a one year web and ap subscription. I tried several times to access the "Manage my Account" page. The reason for wanting to was to check if there is any auto-renewal flag set. Several people have told me New Scientist is well know for ignoring cancellation requests, take the money for renewal, and not returning it. After some exchange of emails I received the final reply from Mr Arnold Spencer (how much more English can you get?). Arnold told there are technical issues with that page, trying to fix...

Antwoord van New Scientist
Entertaining read
DO NOT GIVE THIS RAG YOUR MONEY.
DO NOT GIVE THIS RAG YOUR MONEY.
Buyer beware - they cannot fix online issues promptly. I've been unable to activate a subscription that my card has already been charged for. No refund and now I must get a new card issued to prevent recurring billings. It's not "New Scientist" - its just "Old Fraud".

Antwoord van New Scientist
incompetent management
Absolutely will not deal with these incompetent people again they have stuffed up our subscription so completely. We cannot believe the lack of customer service you should be ashamed.
Dr Werner Fabian

Antwoord van New Scientist
Awful politicised rubbish
Awful politicised rubbish. Took £125 without my knowledge, sent receipt to the wrong address, no refund.

Antwoord van New Scientist
A disappointing decline in quality
Recently, I have been going through a pile of New Scientist magazines from 2017/early 2018. The decline between then and now in terms of the breadth and the quality of content is quite striking. As an inveterate magazine reader, I don't think I have ever witnessed such a sudden nosedive in standards.
Under the editor, Emily Wilson, who was appointed, I believe in April or May, 2018, New Scientist has fallen prey to entropy, regressing to a superficial shadow of its former self; a lifestyle magazine, heavy on op-ed; not above using dogma as a means of crow-barring-in various fashionable progressive social agendas (many of which I do support). This is science on the same level as posting a picture of the Crab Nebula on your social media, accompanied by a quote from the movie 'Interstellar'. It's all posture; the lazy pretence of knowledge.
The new format of the magazine is clearly intended to cast a wider net and engage with new readers from new demographics, which is both admirable and sensible from a commercial standpoint. Sadly, a periodical this slender on meaningful content is unlikely to hold the attention of these potential readers, who are certainly intelligent enough to know when they are pandered to.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Online subscription
Bought an online subscription for family member who is seriously ill. It didn’t give him access so I emailed. Got some generic list of obvious things to try which was completely unhelpful. Phoned them and some guy sent a link that worked for one issue. Family member emailed. They ignored him. He sent another. Got another unhelpful list of questions back. I rang again and was told that they don’t do refunds so even though he hasn’t been able to access something that I’ve paid for, they won’t give me my money back. Appalling service. Never touching this magazine again.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Awful service
Ordered a one off copy that was a compilation of several issues online which said would take 3-5days.
I paid for the postage and the magazine for it not to have arrived over a month later, several phone calls and emails later and I’m still waiting. I’ve constantly been told they are very sorry but I had to wait over 28 days before they would do anything. Then they apparently resent the magazine which again hasn’t arrived and now they have escalated it to another team but can not say how long this will take.
Certainly would not recommend purchasing online with them or there customer service.
Unable to review the magazine as still waiting!
Used to be brilliant
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the destruction of YouTube because the author didn’t like something she saw on it, Brilliant, let’s silence free speech, very scientific. It’s a sad day for science, it’s no place for SJW’s. Can we have authors chosen for scientific merit rather than gender please.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Not so scientific now
For more than 10 years we enjoyed the NS as it brought a wide range of scientific topics to us (geoscientists). Recently we noticed a change as the gender studies and other social science crept in with new editor who appears to have brought all that fluff with her. Not interested. I see that it is easier and cheaper to fill the mag as many professional identity warriors would write for free.
If it keeps up, we are off.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Excellent contents, awful subscription pricing policy
Two completely different experiences, one excellent, the other one awful:
1) The magazine itself, contents, presentation, delivery, etc.: excellent. I recommend it.
2) The subscription policy: I subscribed for one year for a certain amount X. The subscription conditions state (literally) "Thereafter, you will be charged [X] Per Year, unless you tell us to stop". Now, three weeks before renewal date, I get an email indicating that “increasing cost of print, production and postage” make renewal rate to be increased "by a small amount" (which turns out to be a 33% increase, hardly a "small amount" in my humble opinion).
After contacting subscription services I am informed that it is their policy to offer a very advantageous price for new customers but then increase gradually year after year to the "normal" rate.
So how can I trust them after two false statements:
1) The condition in the initial subscription of renewing for same amount.
2) The initial explanation that the "small amount" of increase was due to the "increasing cost of print, production and postage", which later turned out to be their policy to increase price to existing customers once they were in.

Antwoord van New Scientist
1 years direct debit taken - after cancelling subscription techni fault
I have been a New Scientist fan for years. With the arrival of the Internet, I understand that quality journalism and research is massively under threat. Therefore, I have started to subscribe to various publications. I cancelled New Scientist, because I kept being logged out of my phone. This made my subscription useless. Even worse, I contacted support via email to make the cancellation. I was told that it had been done. A year later, I find out that they have been continually taking my money. Guess what? They have no records of the email exchange - so no refund. Disgusting.
UPDATE - I have now received an email that my new subscription service has started, and the direct debit will start taking money on Oct. WHAT??? GO AWAY AND STOP TAKING MY MONEY!!!

Antwoord van New Scientist
Brilliant range of articles
Brilliant range of articles, great and small.

Antwoord van New Scientist
A Disappointing Makeover
I have subscribed since 1960. I am disappointed by the latest version. I have always relied on New Scientist for an overview of developments in all fields of science and technology. While New Scientist still serves this function, coverage can be superficial and often too brief, except for feature articles.

Antwoord van New Scientist
it arrived quickly
it arrived quickly, Enjoyed reading it on paper again and seems perfect for my 12 yr daughter (she liked the exercise article)

Antwoord van New Scientist
I've been reading New Scientist for a…
I've been reading New Scientist for a few years now, and I've always been impressed with how they tackle highly complex subjects in an accessible way (and without resorting to clickbait as many publishers seem to these days).
Highly recommend them to anyone who is looking to keep up to date with science developments and gain a new perspective on the world.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Dit is Trustpilot
Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.
Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.
Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.
Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.
Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.
Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.







