A publication that has no moral principles. It practises the dark art of trapping subscribers into involuntary auto renewal. Whole web site has no access to any feature that allows for disabling of au... Toon meer
We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie
Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie
Lees wat reviewers zeggen
Used to be brilliant, since it’s takeover by a company more interested in equality of outcome rather than science it seems to have become more like ‘hello’ magazine. One recent article called for the... Toon meer
Bedrijf heeft geantwoord
Took out time limited offer and cancelled in good time. They ignored cancellation and took further £65 from card. They reluctantly agreed to refund within ten working days. At end of period said probl... Toon meer
Bedrijf heeft geantwoord
You start a trial with the intention of giving the product a go. You set up a reminder on your calendar to either cancel or continue with subscription. They process the renewal charge more than one... Toon meer
Bedrijf heeft geantwoord
Bedrijfsgegevens
Geschreven door het bedrijf
Science news and science articles from New Scientist
Contactgegevens
2 Derry Street, W8 5TT, London, Verenigd Koninkrijk
- www.newscientist.com
Geen recente geschiedenis van het vragen naar reviews
Dit bedrijf heeft hun klanten niet recentelijk uitgenodigd, dus reviews zijn mogelijk niet representatief
Heeft 96% van zijn negatieve reviews beantwoord
Reageert doorgaans binnen 48 uur
Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot
Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.
Received refund after 3 weeks
I placed an order for a subscription by mistake. I then emailed AND called to exercise my right of cancellation for a refund within 14 days. On the phone, I was told that they had to escalate it and I would receive an email regarding the refund however I have not received anything. After multiple emails and phone calls, it seems very difficult to get anything done with this company.
UPDATE
Finally received refund today so I am happy with the conclusion.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Consistently excellent content
Consistently excellent content
I always enjoy reading the magazine, due to the breadth and quality of the information. Access to the archive on the website is also very useful.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Out of touch.
I wish to purchase the recently published New Scientist book 'The nature of reality'. I have made several attempts to contact them about this but to no avail. Why on earth don't they have a customer-service e-mail address?

Antwoord van New Scientist
I am so disappointed
I am so disappointed. I loved your magazine but i am very angry since I've read an article of Graham Lawton about misleading science (may 6th 2020) with hydroxychloroquine as lonely exemple. Now I'm asking : Is NS impartial ? Can I believe it ?
Other subject : 4 weeks to receive the magazine is too long. So I think I'll quit at the end of my annual subscription.
With regrets

Antwoord van New Scientist
A great bench mark in a world of…
A great bench mark in a world of theatrical statistics and political spin -well done to you all! 👍👷

Antwoord van New Scientist
I read every issue
I read every issue, cover to cover, except the physics news which is beyond me. New Scientist is always thought provoking and I enjoy being part of the community of readers.

Antwoord van New Scientist
I thought I'd ordered the print…
I thought I'd ordered the print version+ app, but have received none since renewal.
I cannot get the information telling me whether you have stopped printing it or not. I'd much prefer it to the app.

Antwoord van New Scientist
The videos are constantly buffering
The videos are constantly buffering, have been horribly organised (there is no search function) and best of all are often recorded in loud malls with echoing background noise. Seriously, what are you thinking?

Antwoord van New Scientist
Declining scientific quality
After 20 years I decided to stop my subscription. The scientific content isn’t of high quality anymore, it makes boring reading, and I already read most of it free from various newsletters. Sad.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Appalling Customer Service
I attempted to buy a subscription to New Scientist as a gift for my father. I used the gift subscription option on their website, which instantly diverted me to their standard subscription signup page. This was a bit of a red flag because a typical gift subscription page would usually allow you to enter your own details alongside those of the recipient.
That wasn't possible, so I entered my own details for billing purposes, assuming that I'd be able to activate the subscription on a different email address.
I was right. You can activate the subscription on another email address, but a couple of days after my father did this, the account was blocked. The New Scientist staff advised they'd blocked the account because they couldn't link it to a subscription. Sigh. Over the next six weeks, my father and I emailed back and forth with the New Scientist trying to explain the issue to them and get it fixed.
As I see it, this was clearly caused by a concerning flaw in their processes, but at no point did I feel like the customer service team really comprehended this. Actually, they weren't willing to address or respond to any of my questions or queries. It seemed a little like I was emailing an automated system. After 6 weeks, we were informed that the issue was resolved. However, my father still cannot log in or activate the account.
He received a physical copy of New Scientist in the post though - which is odd because I only purchased a digital subscription! Given that six weeks were wasted, I asked if the subscription could be restarted, but I never received a response as to whether this had happened or not. I don't have the will to spend half my life trying to fully resolve this, so I guess my poor old man will just have to make do with whatever comes through the post.
This is the most appalling customer service experience I've ever had. I don't typically write reviews but I felt incensed enough by this fiasco to do so. Reading some of the other reviews here, I'm now concerned the next battle will come when they bill me for a renewal without my knowledge or consent. I will never touch this magazine again and would implore anyone reading this to avoid wasting your time, energy and finances.

Antwoord van New Scientist
No longer a quality publication
The quality of the articles has gone way down in the past year or so and now the cost of my annual subscription has gone up by 20% (whilst UK inflation is currently 0.8%). Time to cancel and look elsewhere I think!

Antwoord van New Scientist
Really awful magazine should not…
Really awful magazine should not contain the word scientist in their name
Based on unconfirmed, untested, incomplete information that is dangerous and misleading, disregarding and damaging to human rights advocates

Antwoord van New Scientist
I'm still learning 'bout scientific progress, every week!
My periodic dose of facts, trends and implications of living in a modern technological society, in my California mail box, every week! While retired, I still get to keep up on evolutions, original ideas, and new trends in science...and, often, beyond. It is my anchor, in my belief that human beings CAN be honorable, and considerate, and inventive, despite the nightly news, or the bleatings of some wanna-be politician. And, I have neighbors who beg me for my back copies; they get passed around from house to house on my street in this rural California community, since I retired here from Silicon Valley.
Keep it up, and I'll keep ponying up. Maintain that same attention to important detail...in both the science, and the proficient use of our common language. And, with my forefathers having migrated from the UK, it's often a dose of connection to my ancestral roots.

Antwoord van New Scientist
A zine for girls.
I have been a subscriber for over a decade and have just cancelled my subscription. The target audience has shifted I think - it's now aimed at a school audience, and seems to be obsessed with targeting girls.
It has become a 'zine' aimed at entertaining rather than challenging.
So I've voted with my feet. Scientific American or Science look like better options, or Nature at a push.
Orange Man Bad
If you would like a balanced view, you’re not gonna find it here. It’s a shame cause I actually enjoy most of the content. At every possibility they have to mention Trump in a negative way. I get it, he wasn’t supposed to win. Also in the comment section, the journalist? was rabbiting on about how the right wingers were ruining Twitter for her. In my experience it’s from both sides, but hey that must make me a Nazi.
I would just like to comment in the…
I would just like to comment in the hope that NS take seriously the amount of poor reviews. I had an old and now seemingly outdated view and respect for the magazine. Please make it be known when a boardroom meeting has been had and acted upon in view of getting 99.9% science content back and its branded characteristics. Until then I am inclined to search your competitors.
Stopping subscription
I've been a New Scientist subscriber for literally decades and have generally thoroughly enjoyed the magazine every week. The quality and breath of articles was very good.
In the last few years I've noticed that the non-scientific content has increased and the quality of the articles decreased. Silly mistakes and ambiguities have crept in that should never have made it past the editorial staff (e.g. confusion with power & energy!) Such instances made me question continuing with paying a significant amount of money just to read an ever decreasing number of good articles, which are still to be found. However I did continue in the hope of seeing an improvement.
Then there was the revamp and change of editor last year! This ushered in only more detrimental aspects. Now we have "Games", "Culture" sections, constant adverts for NS events and rather simplistic cooking/hands on experiment sections. Other, dedicated publications exist for these things. This is NOT what I pay good money for in a NS subscription.
So, reluctantly, I have decided not renew my MS subscription in 2020.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Terrible app
Terrible app. I constantly struggle to get my login recognised, and have been locked out each time I come back to the app a few days later. I have had to give up many times. It is no user friendly. The help phoneline does not seem capable of giving sensible advice either.

Antwoord van New Scientist
The magazine is ok but I'm sick and…
The magazine is ok but I'm sick and tired of its sending spam emails asking me to subscribe literally every single day of the year.

Antwoord van New Scientist
Dit is Trustpilot
Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.
Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.
Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.
Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.
Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.
Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.







