We verifiëren geen specifieke claims omdat reviewers hun eigen mening mogen geven. We kunnen reviews echter wel als 'Geverifieerd' bestempelen als we bevestiging hebben dat er een zakelijke interactie heeft plaatsgevonden. Meer informatie

Om de integriteit van het platform te beschermen, wordt elke review op ons platform – al dan niet geverifieerd – gescreend door onze geautomatiseerde software. Deze software kan inhoud identificeren en verwijderen die in strijd is met onze richtlijnen, inclusief reviews die niet zijn gebaseerd op een echte ervaring. We zijn ons ervan bewust dat we weleens wat over het hoofd zien, dus je kunt altijd reviews rapporteren waarvan je denkt dat we ze hebben gemist Meer informatie

Lees wat reviewers zeggen

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

The Review: Stack Overflow (The "Ghost Town" Edition) 1. The "Duplicate" Police are Still on Patrol In 2026, Stack Overflow’s biggest export is still "Closed as Duplicate." I... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Straight up toxic behavior. Avoid as much as possible. It's impossible to upvote or downvote anything anyway. Your questions get downvoted directly without even anyone reading your questions. Asking a... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Harmful moderators. Rude to ask in comments. Dont give you edited codes. Delete your posts. bad company, i will avoid any more click from google. Recommedn you use chatgpt than this... Toon meer

Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

After many years of using discussion forums to try and find answers to technical questions, I came across the focused Q&A format of Stack Overflow and its Stack Exchange sites. Nowadays whenever I ha... Toon meer

1,7

Zeer slecht

TrustScore 1.5 uit 5

226 reviews

5 sterren
4 sterren
3 sterren
2 sterren
1 ster

Zo gebruikt dit bedrijf Trustpilot

Ontdek hoe ze hun reviews verzamelen, beoordelen en modereren.

Bedrijven op Trustpilot mogen geen beloningen aanbieden of betalen om reviews te verbergen. Reviews zijn de meningen van individuele gebruikers en niet van Trustpilot. Meer informatie

Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

The RThe Review: Stack Overflow (The "Ghost Town" Edition)eview

The Review: Stack Overflow (The "Ghost Town" Edition)
1. The "Duplicate" Police are Still on Patrol

In 2026, Stack Overflow’s biggest export is still "Closed as Duplicate." It doesn't matter if your question is nuanced or involves a library update from three minutes ago; a moderator with a 15-year-old badge and a chip on their shoulder will shut it down. Why would anyone subject themselves to this "failed, overconfident" gatekeeping when an AI will actually listen to the prompt?
2. A Community of "Confidently Wrong" Elitists

The irony is palpable. While the platform bleeds users, the remaining "power users" have doubled down on the toxicity.

The Vibe: You ask a question.

The Result: You get three downvotes, a lecture on why your architectural choice is "objectively wrong," and zero actual code.

The Reality: The site has been an "extinction-level event" since 2022. Questions per month plummeted from 100,000 in early 2023 to a measly 3,607 by December 2025.

3. Irrelevance in the Age of AI

The platform is in a desperate identity crisis. They’ve banned AI-generated answers while simultaneously trying to sell their data to AI companies. It’s a "two-headed snake eating itself."

Bottom Line: Why would a developer in their "right state of mind" wait four hours for a moderator to tell them their question is "low effort," when Gemini can refactor the entire function in four seconds—without the attitude?

Stack Overflow vs. AI: The Quick Reality Check
Feature Stack Overflow (2026) AI (Gemini/Claude)
Response Time 4 hours to "never" Instant
Attitude Passive-aggressive / Toxic Patient / Constructive
Flexibility Follows 2014 rigid rules Adapts to your specific code
Status A "husk" of its former self The new industry standard

26 februari 2026
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

My Question was Closed for Thinking Outside the IDE

Closed my VirtualBox question for not programming. cool, so debugging kernel modules in a nested VM, automating labs for exploit dev, and fighting VT-x/AMD-V conflicts don’t count as programming adjacent? Guess writing C in a VM that won’t start is just a lifestyle choice now. Keep gatekeeping. I’ll go where people fix problems instead of moderating them into oblivion.

26 december 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Race to the bottom

Once decent for sharing or acquiring knowledge, now barely useful for programming at all. While the community never was particularly welcoming, it at least was useful.

The push to harvesting and profiting off of the user-generated content with no way of opting out really paints a dim picture.

23 december 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 4 van de 5 sterren

Helpful Community Website

This is still my go-to website when searching for some solutions for my code errors. Some offer a great solution while others lead to dead ends.

2 november 2025
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Unable to create an account

Unable to create an account, neither can login via github nor contact their support because my domain is flagged as "temporary". I am unable to get in contact with specific developers to inform them about a bug...

11 augustus 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Smug Platform with Cloudflare's Endless Captcha Loop of Hell

Don't come here expecting civil moderators and a user-friendly site system. Expect rudeness and Cloudflare's awful captcha loops that never end for users using methods to protect their anonymity from prying governments. Cloudflare is making the digital world Orwellian for people protecting their anonymous activities.

5 mei 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

...not been well-received

I got " Wait! Some of your past questions have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from asking any more."
So be extremely careful what you asking there otherwise you get punished. If you ask something that doesn't please the elite there you are out.

26 februari 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Impossible to ask a question

When you ask a question, their reviewers ask stupid questions, because they don't know anything about the question i am submitting. This is making the platform more and more useless.

10 februari 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

I used this site for the first time…

I used this site for the first time today. I am a beginner using Swift code and I asked a question about syntax for a specific issue. The answer was to point me to a generic answer for similar issues which was unrelated to my specific issue. Pretty useless.

29 januari 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

Home for devs!

Home for devs!
If you are a developer and want to be really a part of somethin, this is starting point for junior devs and also to check for already done solutions.

22 januari 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

I don't use this cocky platform…

I don't use this cocky platform anymore. They drop your questions for no reason. People often act so arrogantly here that it really becomes painful.
If a question gets closed, I wanted to know why that is the case, I want that the people which down rating my question need to add at least 100 chars to point out why it's a bad question, until that point the platform is useless to me. Luckily, all the AI's consuming the content from all the overflow platforms, and we don't have to care about asking question or visiting the site anymore. I really like that, It keeps me away from all the people that just want to act like they are pro's while at the same time behaving like cocky school kids ...
Not the user base I'm searching for.

6 januari 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

They are so ridiculous

They are so ridiculous. It's impossible to get a question out. You have to pass an entire semester to be able to formulate the question as they want. Total waste of time , avoid!

4 januari 2025
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Stack Overflow is no longer the helpful…

Stack Overflow is no longer the helpful platform it claims to be. They temporarily suspended my account for no apparent reason, and when I tried to figure out why, I was met with silence and vague guidelines. It feels like they're more interested in gatekeeping than fostering a helpful community.

What’s the point of a Q&A site if you’re going to block users from asking new questions without explanation? If your system is so broken that you can’t differentiate between genuine contributors and troublemakers, maybe it’s time to fix that instead of punishing users arbitrarily.

It’s ironic how a platform meant to share knowledge is so bad at communicating with its own users. I expected better from what was once a respected resource. Now it just feels like an exclusive club with overly harsh moderators and unfair policies.

27 december 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Could not post question due to old question

Could not post question after posting one that was too unspecific that I had posted long ago. I acknowledged the mistake and wanted to remove the question but was not allowed to. I couldn't improve it because of the nature of the question being unspecific and me having no clue what exactly the situation was. But still was question banned.

17 december 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 2 van de 5 sterren

Just left SO with 46.9k reputation points

I left SO after accumulating 46.9k reputation points over a number of years. In the beginning it was fun, rewarding, and productive. Everyone came to learn and explain what they knew. Over time, people volunteering to manage the thing began to remind me of many HOAs (for non-US readers this is "home owners' associations," which tend attract members who are baby autocrats at enforcing regulations in housing areas): in it for the ego trip of exerting authority. There's still a tremendous repository of good information on the site (which I use now and then), more from years back than recently, but I'm choosing not to contribute any more. The site business seems to know there's a problem and has tried various things to fix it, but so far without success. What a shame....

21 oktober 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 5 van de 5 sterren

you may have noticed on yelp that it is…

If I tell you that - If you don't know the right question then You will not get the right answer- would you edit your reviews here?
You certainly don't deserve somebody who has taken all this time to find a solution to a problem and then ask them the wrong question and then expect them to hand you the right answer. And certainly you dont expect them to help you with the right question so they can give you the right answer...
Are you annoyed because you cannot find the question or the answer ?
Because I call that process learning.
the information is out there for you to put it together in a way (which somebody has already done) that you know exactly what is next and exactly what to ask. otherwise you have to grasp it. or, you can post a bad review and suggest the AI (which cannot create new knowledge or answers or questions) can answer (not solve) your question (which it didnt solve it simply answered and now you think you know), so people who are creating new answers and questions are obsolete.
Hm. So you dont have any questions, do you?

you may have noticed on yelp that it is mostly complaints, Posted by people who are being served by other people and annoyed that those people are doing some thing for them are not being nice to them even though they are paying money. If you haven't thought about what's wrong with that and why the complaints and negative reviews far outweigh the positive, then you have no reference as to why stack is an excellent company And providing a service that no one else is. they Aren't there to answer your questions.
AI is there to answer your questions.
AI can answer your questions because you were unable to find them... And when AI answers your questions you will not have the knowledge that you could've had if you had answered your questions or known how to ask the question that would give you the knowledge . It takes a lot more than AI to understand.

Stack is an excellent service if you know how to use it and you know what to do with it.
Just like everything else valuable in the world. lazy and convenient is the mother of invention and i get it, the world gets 1 star, am i right.

3 november 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 3 van de 5 sterren

Déplaisant mais globalement utile

Évidemment, avec son armée de petits flics qui brandissent compulsivement le règlement et son culte puéril de la réputation, le forum n’a pas une atmosphère particulièrement agréable, et le rachat de tous les sites apparentés par un groupe financier en 2021 n’a rien amélioré. On peut cependant arriver à grignoter quelques points et être moins snobé si on se montre philosophe ;-) Plus intéressant, la base de réponses existante est conséquente et on peut souvent s’en satisfaire. Et pour conclure, c’est un vrai paradis comparé aux forums de maths du groupe, dont je ne dirai rien par peur du point Godwin ;-)

20 november 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging
Beoordeeld met 1 van de 5 sterren

Ticket System Missing

Is not able to process a phishing incident report, which can resolved by writing a script to invalidate a couple of links. Also moderator training and ticket system for such incidents is completely missing.

18 november 2024
Review zonder uitnodiging

Is dit jouw bedrijf?

Claim je profiel om toegang te krijgen tot de gratis zakelijke tools van Trustpilot en versterk de relatie met je klanten.

Gratis account aanmaken

Dit is Trustpilot

Iedereen kan een review op Trustpilot achterlaten n.a.v. een ervaring met een bedrijf. Gebruikers hebben het recht om hun feedback op elk moment te wijzigen of te verwijderen, en elke gepubliceerde review is zichtbaar zolang het account van de betreffende gebruiker actief is.

Bedrijven kunnen reviews verzamelen via geautomatiseerde uitnodigingen. Deze reviews worden als geverifieerd bestempeld, omdat het evident is dat ze op echte ervaringen gebaseerd zijn.

Lees meer over geverifieerde reviews.

Wij beveiligen ons platform met behulp van toegewijde specialisten en slimme technologieën. Lees meer over hoe wij nepreviews bestrijden.

Lees meer over Trustpilots reviewproces.

Hier vind je 8 tips voor het schrijven van een goede review.

Verificatie helpt ervoor te zorgen dat echte mensen de reviews schrijven die je op Trustpilot ziet staan.

Beloningen aanbieden voor reviews of een slechts een bepaalde groep mensen vragen om een review te schrijven, kan de TrustScore beïnvloeden. Dit is in strijd met onze richtlijnen.

Lees meer