FCA Reviews 

Waste of time.

This organisation is setup to protect banks and consumera and it does not but rather allows unscrupulous people and organisations like Skrill scam and steal money from people like myself which is just terrible. The FCA states we take everything seriously but actually they are just scammers like the people that steal money from people and do nothing about it ...shame on the the FCA

The FCA are supposed to set regulation which are supposed to be law biding for the banks to follow. Great, but when NOBODY follows the regulations, NOBODY does anything about it, so what's the point. The point is to pretend to care and do anything and of course if the regulations are in their favour then all the banks are protected. If the regulations are not in their favour then all the banks just break the rules and do whatever they want and there are no consequences for them and the customers get done-in.
Everyone involved with this organisation should be ashamed of themselves. It's like everything in the UK - set up to protect the wealthy.

A follow up from a complaint against Blackhorse, I had issues with the gearbox and driveshaft on my car. the last complaint regarding the gearbox was was dealt with fine and i was told by the advisor that i would have to complain seperately about the driveshaft. which i have done. They have Failed to address the issue which I was complaining about ie: Blackhorse`s responsibility to help with the car issue. also they have found no record of the previous complaint!! shear incompetence!

FCA-H. Ch. Brace ist ein betrüger und lügner und errpresser , ih habe noch nie mein Geld bekommen. Mein E-Mail am März 2025-, bitte weiter leiten. Milan Sitar

Ho acquistato una Fiat 600 otto mesi fa e ho già ricevuto 2 richiami! Ma come lavorate????

I was forced to cancel my authorisation with the FCA because I hadn't needed to provide finance for patients at my dental practice for 2 years.
I didn't want to have it cancelled.
I was then provided with a hefty bill for the following year because I hadn't told them that I would be cancelling my authorisation 3 months prior to this date.
A complete money making scam.

Complete waste of time will spend months trying to wear you down then will say best take it to court( oh you have no funds as it was stolen by a firm we protect) A FRAUD

Service client nullissime . Je ne suis plus locataire du véhicule depuis juillet 2020, mais ils n’ont pas fait le nécessaire et ils continuent à donner mon nom aux services de police lorsque le nouveau propriétaire fait des excès de vitesse. Impossible de leur faire comprendre malgré tous les documents de vente signés par eux même !! A fuir !!

Brug aldrig dette agentur, det er et stort svindel firma.
de skulle hjælpe mig med at få frigivet noget krypto og det endte bare med at koste mig kassen...
Agentens navn er nok fiktivt, men Jessica Tivey..

Nil Stars
They are funded by the financial bodies and biased in their favour. If they do decide in your favour they have no power to enforce the decision and their advice is to go to court to get it acted upon.
They should be disbanded and an independent ethical body with enforcement powers set up.

Dont trust the FCA
All you must know is that London UK is the biggest financial place in Europe.
Most of the scamming agencies and brooker working in London. So the intention of FCA is to make money in UK, therfore there is no big interest of FCA to stop all the scamming companies.

Se dedican a estafar a clientes del todo inocentes o ignorantes en una cadena de delincuencia que va desde Argon international pasando por varios "bancos" sitos en Malta, España y Gran Bretaña. Evítenlos.

Impossibile avere calcolo estinzione anticipata, pagina del mio profilo non funzionante da mesi. Al telefono dicono di aver aperto ticket x sbloccare la situazione. Non e' vero o nessuno se ne occupa. n contratto 5000196281 c'e' qualcuno che puo' aiutarmi?

Fasulli, dicono di essere i difensori dei truffati.
Ma tentano di truffare altri soldi. Io non ci sono cascato, ma ci hanno provato.
Attenti

Raised Complaint with FCA sent a poor reply upholding the decision not to pay our trinity claims policy expert alleging a compensation payment was made this was untrue fake fraudulent it would appear FCA are not investigating correctly I asked for a Subject Access Request which contradicts FCA

Llevan semanas contactado conmigo siempre es el mismo engaño ,que tengo 80,000€ cojelado en blogchain, y son ta
N amables que lo quieren devover,Parecen tan formales como los estafadores de virgobanc.net, o virgoba
nc.com ,yo creo que son los mismos criminales bandidos !!

Should you wish to speak with the FCA you will be faced with countless hurdles AND ultimately be directed back to square one. As a so called regulator they are totally unfit for purpose and the chances of them spotting or dealing with a scandal and or scam are virtually zero. It is not a matter of if another huge scandal occurs it is when. When they will be inevitable found wanting what then - another public enquiry!

Why do the FCA not make the banks have to have a human answer the phone within a set time? And why are the banks not made to have a contact email address for customer service issues?????

Commissioner Bias - The FCA gave some information to contact The Bank of Scotland over a DCA complaint raised in 2024.

The information was incorrect leaving me unable to contact the firm.

I raised a service complaint with the FCA that seen a poor response taking no ownership of this poor service.

I then raised a further complaint to the commissioner of the FCA. This seen complete bias leaving the organisation without being held to account.

The Commissioner sent her bias primary decision, i had challenged. Despite challenging the decision she failed to acknowledge the evidence i had sent to her office.

This then seen the bias commissioner write a decision failing to acknowledge my evidence and challenge letter.

Its clear, the FCA are covered unfairly by the bias commissioner who is not fit to be a commissioner.

What's important here, this complaint related to the New Discretionary Commission Arrangement (DCA). The FCA are clueless to dealing with these complaints seeing no action taken against this organisation for continued poor service.

A recent phone call to the FCA about another DCA complaint. Has seen a lady at the FCA being extremely rude to me during the call.

This lady was so unprofessional, I was left forced to ask for a manager. She replied saying, she has no manager.

I requested a DSAR from the FCA to listen to the phone call again. I was shocked to hear the lady putting my call on hold, to speak with her manager. Actually, laughing and joking with each other saying - I've got one of those callers again about a DCA.

This lady went on to give more insults to me behind my back during the call. What took me back also, There was actually a manager available as my complaint has now seen the FCA own up to the lady that was laughing and joking about my call. Was the manager of this rude lady at the FCA.

I really have no words here, the discrimination and abuse i have received from the FCA is appalling in so many ways.

My report to this complaint is being published on 17 April 2025 by the FCA Commissioner. Please read this, but do understand the bias commissioner who thinks she is very clever by refusing to acknowledge further evidence before writing her final report. Has clearly acted very bias towards the FCA.

How could the commissioner not acknowledge evidence before issuing her bias report. This speaks volumes and has demonstrated how bias the commissioner is. But also, demonstrates how useless the FCA have become.

To think we are relying on the FCA to decide on how DCA complaints will be investigated is concerning when being treated like this by the FCA and commissioner.

I raised a complaint in Febraury, they took up my complaint and sent me progress emails with handler information etc. Then they sent me a survey on how they were doing.
Over a month later they sent me an email stating my complaint was not one they could pursue due one of their rules. Now if the person handling my complaint knew their job at the start, we could have saved a lot of time !!
They then sent me another survey with questions which included:
"Place yourself on the scale below".
Now that should read "Rate us on the scale below". Who the heck is writing and who is approving their surveys ?! Obviously people with a poor grasp of English.
Their survey of their service then went into a second page where they wanted to know my personal details such as whether I am non-binary, what gender I was assigned at birth with many options to choose from. You get the drift !... A drift far away from common sense and reality.
What a terrible service from what should be a respected company the public can look up to. But now they are just the opposite. The FCA should employ people with the ability to do the job in question, rather than if they 'tick a box'.